Chess Forum
playchesscomputer.net << online chess - < chess - chess > - chess online >>
| From | Message | ||||||||||||||||
| Posted by ccmcacollister playchesscomputer.net 1/11/2008 17:37:54 Play chess computer |  Subject: What have you learned recently?Message: It would help if respondents would indicate their rating range, and I'll tell you why in a moment. We might then throw in also ... What do you Not Know but think you should? I had this GREAT IDEA (aka probably eccentric, possibly a bit weird?!) that wouldn't it be great to see a Chess Book that annotated games, that would be essentially three books in one. The game annotated for under 1400, 1400 to 1800, and over 1800. With a little doodad denoting which rating range the note is meant for ... the thought being It is Something that that range should know to advance, yet may not know. IMO very many skills come at certain ranges, as a generality. As a specific, well there are 1200 players for eg who lose to an B or higher because they do not know as much. Then there are those who Know an awful lot! But will drop a piece at some point whether oversight, impatience or whatever. But in general I think there are certain things players should know at certain levels. You cannot be a master if you do not know forcible line opening an be able (and do) spot such points on the board when attacking for EG. The thought occurred to me then, it might even be more appealing if the book had a person from those two lower note echelons help write it. Perhaps the 1400 has a question best answered by the 1700 for Eg, in an understandable way. Also what the 1700 Has learned since being 1400, is probably a lot of what Should be known to make that advancement. What do you think? More importantly What do you Know NOW that you didn't awhile ago? Thanks all! | ||||||||||||||||
| Posted by ccmcacollister playchesscomputer.net 1/11/2008 17:39:24 Play chess computer | What i learned. Message: | ||||||||||||||||
| Posted by bhidragon playchesscomputer.net 1/12/2008 18:10:12 Play chess computer | Recent Learnings Message: 1. Premature attacks hardly ever work ... and always leave you in absolutely bad positions. Don't count on your opponent to make a mistake in order to successfully attack. 2. Don't just memorize opening moves ... study the strategy behind your favorite openings and how the rest of the game unfolds from those opening positions. If you're studying opening books that are simply lists of moves ... toss them and study general principles. 3. Play at your speed ... not your opponent's. I learned this the hard way in OTB tourneys. Your tendency is to speed up against a fast player. Stay calm and take the time to study the position. Maybe this would be helpful for players in the 800 - 1200 range on GameKnot ——— Anand's missed opportunity — The chess World Championship is on a knife-edge. But Anand could have made a mark in this game. Anand and Topalov go into the 12th game of their chess match today with scores level. If drawn, tie-break rapid games will be played on Thursday. Topalov's declaration before the match that he would neither offer nor accept a draw has clearly had a liberating effect on both players, resulting in one of the most entertaining world chess championship finals we have seen in years. All the games have been long and hard-fought, so it's hardly surprising that tiredness is affecting play. Anand missed several chances to win in game 9, Topalov had a promising endgame in game 10 but ... Posted by doctor_knight | playchesscomputer.net 1/12/2008 21:01:22 Play chess computer Message: 1) if your position is solid enough, the opponent will very likely make a blunder at my level. That seems to be how I have made most of my wins. It seems that at my level, if I don't let my pieces hang and establish an effective coorination between my pieces, the opponent doesn't really seem to know what to do and eventually tries something wild which usually ends up in him/her losing a pawn, piece, control of squares, and etc. Though at my level, the advantage given up is usually material and usually substantial enough to win almost easily. 2) don't be scared to live on the edge some. If you don't try a risky counter attack now, then you'll never develop the skills necessary to do one later in a more important game. Of course don't be reckless, but don't be scared to dive into the pool. It will force you to raise your level of performance to exercise your brain to work through the position. It will also help you to develop a sense of what types of moves and positions tend to crash your position and which ones will strengthen it. It will help to develop your "intuition". Now what I would like to know? 1) I haven't really though about this much, but I know one area where I need improvement is trading off the center pawns. This area of play seems a little mysterious to me. I would definately like some help with this (when to exchange, which pawns to exchange, which pawns to protect with what pieces, which pieces to recapture with, which pawns are really weak, how to identify an opponent's bad pawn capture, and how to punish it. Also to see which pawn captures are actually legitimate threats. The whole enchilada) 2) Time control. The root of most of my mistakes and failures in OTB play seems to be time control. Sometimes I have a really bad awareness of my time, especially while calculating combinations/exchanges. It's almost like I drift off into some fantasy world of board positions and pieces moving around capturing each other and become hardly aware that the clock is ticking down. ——— Playing for the World Title, Minus Any Fireworks — Before a world chess championship match, players spend months looking at their opponent’s games and studying opening systems, often with the aid of chess computers and databases. They also hire trainers, who are called seconds, to help. It is a time- and labor-intensive process. That is one of the reasons that fans look forward to the chess matches. They want to see what the players will do and what new ideas they have discovered, particularly in the openings. The current world chess championship match between Viswanathan Anand of India, the titleholder, and Veselin Topalov of Bulgaria has been as closely contested as predicted. But there have been no eye-opening innovations. Game ... Posted by wschmidt | playchesscomputer.net 1/14/2008 11:57:21 Play chess computer Interesting thoughts, Craig....Message: The second book is his latest, "Silman's Endgame Course" (or something similar). He doesn't set the book up by typical endgame book catagories like pawn endgames, rook endgames, etc. Rather, the chapters are divided into what he thinks a player needs to know as they increase their rating level. I don't own it, but it's gotten generally good reviews, I believe. What have I learned recently? Wow, 2007 was quite a year in that regard. I learned how to checkmate with the knight and bishop. I mean really learned it and practiced it, not just read about it and played through the moves once or twice. I learned, for the umpteenth time, that while there is a difference between memorizing moves in the opening and playing according to good general opening principles, there is also a difference between playing according to good general opening principles and actually looking at the board! That difference actually lasts into the middle and endgame as well. Understanding the concrete position on the board trumps general principles everyday. I learned (or developed) a method that works for me for analyzing/annotating my own games. I learned that Purdy's method of "try to guess the master's move" way of reading over an annotated game really works and is really quite fun. Over at the Chess Coaching Club, I've learned that some folks really are interested in being coached and others, well, not so much. This would be a good thread to revisit at the end of 2008! ws ——— With Another Draw, Chess Championship Match Remains Tied — Game 10 of the world chess championship match between Viswanathan Anand of India, the titleholder, and Veselin Topalov of Bulgaria, ended in a relatively uneventful draw on Friday. With only two games remaining in the best-of-12 series, the players are tied with 5 points apiece. If the match should remain tied after the last two games — which is a real possibility at the moment — it would go to a tie-breaker of four rapid games (each player starts with 25 minutes and has 10 seconds added to his time after each move). Such a tie-breaker was used in the 2006 world chess championship match between Topalov and Vladimir Kramnik of Russia. After each player won a game, and one ended ... Posted by marinvukusic | playchesscomputer.net 1/14/2008 14:13:19 Play chess computer Regarding Mr. SilmanMessage:  www.jeremysilman.com
This is one of the best Web pages on the Internet for beginners and intermediate players. I recommended it to a lot of people. Anyone who is willing to put some time into digging around it will be rewarded :) ——— Title Match Remains Tied After Champion Misses Win — With the world chess championship match having entered a critical stage, Viswanathan Anand of India, the titleholder, switched openings in Game 9, hoping to recapture momentum and the lead that he relinquished with a loss in Game 8. He almost did. But, with victory in sight, Anand faltered and missed a couple of winning continuations, which allowed Veselin Topalov of Bulgaria, the challenger, to salvage the game and keep the best-of-12 match tied. In each of the previous games he had White, Anand had steered the opening into the Catalan system, which is solid, but not too dynamic. In Game 9, he played 3 Nc3 instead of 3 Nf3 for the first time. That gave Topalov ... Posted by cascadejames | playchesscomputer.net 1/19/2008 00:07:54 Play chess computer Giving up a pawnMessage: clear purpose in mind. It doesn't always work, but sometimes the results can be gratifying when the sacrifice works out. Of course this does not mean that the loss of a pawn is not important, only that sometimes it is justified. ——— The Best Woman in Chess Still Stands Alone at the Top — Judit Polgar is the only woman to ever be ranked in the world’s top 10, or even in the top 100. At age 34, her ranking has slipped to 51 (from No. 8 in 2005) as the responsibilities of being a wife and mother — she has two children, ages 3 and 5 — have left her little time to train and compete. Since 1991, when Polgar became the youngest chess grandmaster in history, more than a dozen women have also earned the title. Two of them, Humpy Koneru of India and Hou Yifan of China, became grandmasters when they were even younger than Polgar. But no other woman has been able to break into the chess elite. Koneru is 23, and Yifan is only 16, so it seems likely that ... Posted by lighttotheright | playchesscomputer.net 1/19/2008 06:21:01 Play chess computer Message: Strac has shown me that I'm not quite as good as I once thought. As soon as he played 18. a5 for the control of the pivotal square on b6, I knew my latest game with him was over. He had a critical bind upon my Queen-side position; there was nothing that I could do about it once it was played. It was a small advantage for him that was unfortunately for me game winning. I've known for a while, but it has never been so clear to me than now...about the difference between a strategic move and a positional one. A positional move is strategic; but a strategic move is not necessarily a positional one. A strategic move will maximize your chances, while a positional move will ELIMINATE your opponent's. Strac's move of 18. a5 shut down my entire position because it forced me to constantly adjust while he continued to advance. My chances were eliminated under best play. Posted by alice02 | playchesscomputer.net 1/19/2008 08:51:58 Play chess computer not describing moves to myselfMessage: I don't drop as many significant pieces - though I still occasionally do so. When I started dropping pieces I decided to check every individual piece for the moves it could make. There is a knight - it can move there and there etc. I have now learnt to look at a knight's potential moves as a clock face. I have also learnt to see that two important pieces separated by either 1 or 3 squares is a potentially dangerous situation when a knight is around. I wonder if there is a chess developmental difference in thinking - this is a bishop's line vs a bishop can move to that or that or that square. A knight can move to that or that or that square vs a knight"s movement is like a clock face. Maybe you have to think in terms of individual squares before you can think in terms of lines. And I can only see lines when I am predicting one move. When I am trying to predict 2 or more moves I use square by square thinking. I think this type of thinking may be a stage in learning but also that it blocks me from seeing combinations. Posted by doctor_knight | playchesscomputer.net 1/19/2008 20:37:49 Play chess computer Message: (3) How to make strategical moves as apposed to simply positional moves, though I'm thinking this may take a long long time. Posted by ccmcacollister | playchesscomputer.net 1/22/2008 08:11:43 Play chess computer I learned Message: Much more economical than the unweildy Rook and Two-Pawns-in-the-middle King havens of my past ... ! |